Free Pic Of Hot Brazillannes Women

7. Slowly ...

... Also reached.

This will be a short number. The words of the Jesuit Baltasar Gracian Aragon, will be "twice as good" if it is at least "a good time." Interestingly, the bad, if it is large, is twice as bad. You will see if this Homer will be the first or the second statement of Mr. Gracian.

A review, neither more nor less. 'Sort the many. " That's the point. Reaffirm certain concepts and principles that are so widely spoken, have been excluded from consideration.

One understands that these issues are not taken from the same children with absolute seriousness, maturity requires a major effort, a total commitment to the cause, if you want to really get somewhere.

If we add the limitations of the writer of these lines, imagine the picture!

The clear voice of the beloved forever young Raúl Scalabrini Ortiz beautify the last act of our little work. Even without being with us physically, Raúl spoke in exercise of "moral first magistracy of the Republic" in the words of another treasured friend of the house.






----------~@~----------

and forming a duet with Don Raúl insurmountable, we received the visit of Pope Leo XIII. His words are, at present, so clear, so timely and important as they were in due course.

The only 'long' in this issue will be the final duet, harmonized by the prosecutor but delicate brush of Don Lino Enea Spilimbrego. As can be seen, we absolutely every taste.

You know judge whether we should edit further or left wanting to read on.

Slowly ... also comes (2011) A Homer

1) Allegro Assai

2) Adagio ma non tanto

Soloists: Paul Martin Cerone




Darío Lavia 3) Affettuoso

Soloists: Raúl Scalabrini Ortiz


Leo XIII
Lino Enea Spilimbergo

----------~ ~----------

share with you the desire of a new year healthy, strong, authentic, powerful and also more mature, a year to honor commitments assumed with our families, our community, our country, and above all else, ourselves.

A Homer

----------~@~----------

1) Allegro Assai

The independence of the United States North America brought to Europe the ideal constitution and government of the people. His influence on the French Revolution is indisputable.

circulating in Spain and their ghosts in the late eighteenth ghosts whose voices repeated echoes of the old ideas of Carlos III and a liberal view that it was far from hesitant and adapt to the turbulent political map of the peninsula.

In Buenos Aires, lived hours of British invasions. Under these circumstances, while Joseph Bonaparte at the head of the English Crown, Don Martin Olabarría Alzaga and plotting to declare independence from the Viceroyalty of Río de la Plata.

Subsequent to May 2, when Madrid rose against Napoleon, the English cities began to govern from hiding at the hands of popular boards.

Alzaga interpreted the times and the winds, installing the first board in our land America in Montevideo by 21 September 1808.

By January 1809, would the coup against the viceroy Liniers. Seconded the project a young man who should be paying attention, Don Mariano Moreno. The end was none other than the creation of a Board.

But Saavedra, consistent with the idea of \u200b\u200b"authority", "monarchy", "order" values \u200b\u200bthat our generals San Martín and Belgrano would be its greatest exponents and defenders Liniers replenished to the "reconquer and Defender" in office ... in stoppage time.

In Upper Peru, Don Pedro Domingo Murillo had organized the much talked about and desired Board, back in July 1809. By April 1810, had one in Caracas.

In Buenos Aires, after clashes between Cisneros, Alzaga and Saavedra, would end up imposing "the voice of the people: our own Board, chaired by Don Cornelio Saavedra naturally. A bit of already established, would take Basque forward the idea, namely the so-called representatives of all major cities of our viceroyalty to Congress.

deputies arrived. But a Congress, but added directly to the Board. In concrete terms, became an executive body to govern.

Saavedra-The struggle between the conservative and Moreno-May-wing revolutionary, it would distort into the first naturally occurring throughout the length and breadth of our interior. Moreno embodied the liberal ideals, supported by young idealists and illuminated Buenos Aires, much to the new style. Saavedra, all the rest.

British influence and our first steps for independence are our "egg and chicken." Defeated in North America and blocked by Napoleon on the continent, helped us release our markets and direct them to their own trade and interest. In due time we were segregated, divided, in debt and without any horizon, with our production and national economy completely defined and controlled by the British. Their moral support was none other than the incessant preaching of economic liberalism and a sacred respect for the capital and toward private ownership still ring true today in these very well-intentioned lips arguments. Moreno

translate the Constitution of the United States. Moreno resign, and expiring dying a little of it. Along with him evanescería a constitutional ideal.

----------~@~----------

to 1811 in Spain, the Council of Regency collide with the boards and scattered throughout breadth of the peninsula. Cadiz war between the Council and the Board of Valencia. Division of towns in the Canaries. Equal differences scattered throughout English America. Boards representing freedom, the people's rights. The Council decided to accept absolutism. America under the same fire burning.

Independence War which was then waging against Napoleon's Spain .

Freemasonry, laborious and constant burner liberalism and constitutionalism.

San Martin was a English military. He was part of a lodge in Cadiz would send him to London with Carlos Maria de Alvear and other men. Is the Plan? Found a Lodge to give concrete forms and then drive the process of independence in the Americas. Lautaro Lodge born and with it a hint of national independence.

English Boards Napoleon showed him that people did not accept the reign of his brother, which significantly altered continental relationship as much as overseas. Constant bloodletting might hold the itinerary of the Grand Corso.

Of all the possible scenarios, the annexation of Latin America to the United States, the Russians, then owners of fortifications in Alaska and California, in addition to Charlotte, to the Bourbons, the English ... Napoleon understood that the best thing that could happen to their hegemonic project was that America became a great independent nation-even to himself that he had no means of avoiding it, but also from all their enemies and their relatives.

----------~@~----------

"The most terrible of all totalitarian machines is one that runs along the rails of credit" the words of Admiral Rial on June 8, 1956

"Our army is the National Bank." Lord Ponsonby

England read the political map as only they usually do, and you would anticipate, creating for commercial and financial ties that ultimately will be as crucial in the forging of our national and our brightest on winning battles and losses ", or our struggles or our dictatorships ... ... anyway.

By 1814 with the fall of Napoleon, the English liberal revolution was dying.

Ferdinand's return to power would nullify all the gains of the English people's movement restoring "black Spain" vindictive and blind. The fate of America enters channel definitions and independence is a must: independence of feudal reaction now enthroned. Well born "on the run" independent political life over a continent inexperienced to exercise sovereign power springs. As a result, we will live again and the frustration of not being able to see realized the dreams of Patria Grande.

----------~@~----------

2) Adagio ma non tanto

San Martín, Lodges and American Independence
3 Delivery of 3
Paul Martin Cerone


Independence

After several months of ups and downs, the May 3, 1816 took over the Board a member of ally Lodge San Martin, Juan Martin de Pueyrredón, indicating a reorientation of the objectives of the group. By that time he had met a new congress of delegates of the United Provinces, which became known as the Congress of Tucumán. Provinces like Santa Fe, Entre Rios and Corrientes, allied Artigas, did not send representatives, yes they did Potosí, Charcas and Cochabamba, now part of Bolivia. This detail serves as a symbol of the fundamental instability in their early times, as we understand today as Argentina.

repeated in the Congress was the division that had emerged within the Lautaro Lodge with respect to the need to declare independence. Backstage, San Martin and Belgrano were the two champions. Both even had a theory about how it should be the form of government. Like almost all then, thought of a constitutional monarchy, but he added an extra spice: the monarch should be a descendant of the Inca emperors.

The proposed restitution of the monarchy of Cuzco was presented by Manuel Belgrano in the secret session of July 6, 1816, and approved by 31 March. The mainstream of Argentine historians treat it as a crazy idea, and that is why he devotes little space in any historical work that deals with the time. In this contempt continue the ill will felt the Buenos Aires bourgeoisie, which would make it impossible to finish aborted the idea. Mitre

explains in his "History of Belgrano, the reasons that encouraged this idea: "(...) But the Inca monarchy was still more than an ideal: it was a conventional manner, and according to the universal consensus, the only model human worth admiring and imitated as it is rationally American democracy today (...)".
Belgrano
This proposal was the response of the Lodge to the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo, which hampered the Republican options, and out to meet the indigenous mass uprising in Upper Peru. The proposal of the Inca King embraced the idea of \u200b\u200ba continental nation that had already appeared in the machinations of Miranda, and the Revolutionary Plan Mariano Moreno and his followers in the Patriot League Lautaro Lodge.

Independence was finally declared on July 9, 1816. Simultaneously, the hour of liberation of the homeland of Lautaro.

The release of Chile and the end of the Lodge

In early 1817 he was crossing the Andes from the Argentine Army - Chile. Revolutionary arms in February won a significant victory at Chacabuco and entered Santiago. Just was March 12, 1817 when he founded the Chilean subsidiary of the Lautaro Lodge. Their brains were Bernardo O'Higgins and José de San Martín, and other prominent members were Thomas Guido, José Antonio Balcarce, José Ignacio Zenteno, Juan Gregorio Las Heras, Ramón Freire, Manuel Blanco, Miguel and Ramon Zañartu Arriagada.

Back in Chile, once asserted its independence with the victory Maipu in 1818, came the last part of the plan: the attack on Peru, coordinated pincer movement with Bolívar's armies operating from the north. It is then that San Martin was ordered by the Lodge of Buenos Aires, returning with his army to crush the uprisings of the leaders of the Coast, Estanislao López and Francisco Ramírez. The Liberator is denied, in his own words, to "shed the blood of brothers." Voted his resignation in Rancagua, the General Staff of the Army of the Andes, on March 26, 1820, resolved at once reject and disobey the orders of the government of Buenos Aires.

This decision was fatal to the Board of Buenos Aires. Arguably, in turn, meant the fulfillment of the original purpose of the Lautaro Lodge and sentenced to extinction. Pueyrredón, loyal support of the campaign in Chile but fearful of any movement of such folk, he had fallen in April 1819, delivered by the Lodge as a scapegoat. In February 1820, Cepeda, the Coastal montoneras weak armies crushed the locals.

it would follow the dissolution of the Lodge and decades of civil war in the former United Provinces. Buenos Aires, unable to impose its project, had to retreat into itself for some years. But the dominant group not forget that, largely due its failure to San Martín refusal to abandon the campaign to liberate to come to his defense. This would cost the man Yapeyú the permanent hostility of the authorities of his country (with the exception of that López and Juan Manuel de Rosas) and would make it impossible (for lack of support) to crown his season with the award for having finally defeated the proud English lion, a task that would correspond to another Liberator and secret society member independence, his friend Simon Bolivar. Like many others in the history of our nations, the prize for their efforts was in exile.

----------~@~----------

Post World

Dario Lavia

1-Declaration of American Independence

This famous idealized portrait shows the five main authors of the Declaration, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin John Adams, Robert R. Livingston and Roger Sherman. In the background are 42 of the 56 signers of the declaration. The artist, John Trumbull, had the delicacy of painting Jefferson's foot stepping on Adams, symbolizing their political enmity ...


The Declaration of Independence, John Trumbull, 1856 .

2 - Signature of the American Revolution

If the signature of the declaration had occurred on 4 July 1776, only two members of Congress, Charles Thomson and John Hancock, have affixed their signature although it is believed that day no one signed anything. Actually, most of the delegates signed on August 2. Hancock's signature - to be the president of Congress - the first, while Thomas Jeffereson and John Adams (future presidents) signed under Hancock. The oldest signer was Benjamin Franklin (70 years), while the lowest was Edward Rutledge (26). The last of the 56 signatories had to sign on the margins due to lack of space in the statement.



The Signing of the Declaration of Independence, 1913 .

3 - First public reading of the Declaration ...

Members of Congress left the Independence Hall to attend the first public reading of the text of the Declaration of Independence. The famous Liberty Bell tania to invite citizens to not miss the great event.

The First Public Reading of the Declaration of Independence, Howard Pyle, 1880 .

4 - First reading of the Declaration New York

The July 9, 1776 this scene (or something similar) took place in New York City, which was the fourth city in which was read publicly (on 8 July there was reading in Philadelphia, Trenton and Easton). Each of these events was received by the audience with shouts, huzzas, musket fire and burning British flags ...


First Reading of the Declaration of Independence in New York, Harper's Weekly, 1870 .

----------~@~----------

3) Affettuoso

(in Green, the first clarinet Scalabrini. Red, the first violinist of Leo XIII. All illustrations are Lino Enea Spilimbergo)

There are two policies: the visible and invisible. The second turned to Argentina on base and weapon supply British The gradual destruction of the American soul by the subsequent invasion of international economic forces, eventually supplant the truth with lies. Intelligence would not accept it, and unwavering in the interest of a perk and illusion of freedom. Back to reality is an inescapable imperative. Patriotism does not replace the lack of knowledge acquired in time.

"Homeland" is a fellowship supported by traditions, collective memory of peoples, and national ideals where they merge and survive the perishable ideals of individual citizens. But it is also a kind of sui generis commercial society whose members are intertwined -sometimes even against their will, by economic ties indissoluble.

What do you think the intelligence, which undoubtedly should be encouraged to force the different problems Argentines? Who do you customize that intelligence? Intelligence around Argentina there is a real intellectual customs confiscated and prevents the spread of any knowledge of the reality of Argentina and that does not stop with mutilation of all kinds. The

college, journalism, politics and the important functions of public life sprayed on the minds a sense of unreality paralyzing ideological rather a burst of insecticide on mosquitoes. Argentina intelligence dumbed always remained. The information provided was audited, university education was complicit with the journalist who harassed the nationalist voices with patience and perseverance, planting a totalitarian and foreignizing halo around him.


Masonry is one of the most effective tools for managing Britain's peoples from invisibility.

The race of wealthy can wall off their own resources, so you need less from the protection of public authority. Poor people, as no means to defend themselves, must rely heavily on state patronage. For this the State must shelter with unusual care and provdencia day laborers who constitute the majority of the crowd indigent.

But promoted harmful and deplorable developments in the sixteenth century, after upsetting, above all things of the Christian religion, by natural consequence then went to philosophy, and within all spheres of civil society. From here, as their source, were derived from those modern principles of unbridled freedom, invented in major developments of the last century and proposed as the basis and foundation of a new right, never known, and dissenting in many parts of not only the Christian right, but also natural.

The State is not only the crowd, women and governor of herself, and, as they say that the people themselves is the only source of all rights and all authority, it follows that the State is not obliged to believe God by any kind of duty, do not publicly profess any religion, nor should seek what is, among many, the only true, or prefer any one to the other, or promote a mainly, but granted all equal rights, provided that the regime of State does not receive from them any kind of damage. From which it follows also leave to the discretion of individuals all matters relating to religion, allowing everyone to follow the one you prefer, if any, does not approve any. Hence the freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of thought and freedom of the press (...) Freedom, as the perfection of man, must be aimed at the true and good, but the ratio of real and good can not be changed at the whim of man, but remains always the same, with that which is itself unchanging nature of things.

The "universal freedom" is not in law or in any of the Argentine constitution, let alone in people's consciousness. Universal freedom is precisely the ideal that caress foreign capital. In their defense they infiltrate the national body, bypassing the difficulties and distrust silencing. (...) In an organized society even rudimentary freedoms can not speak of abstract without giving rise to the suspicion that something is not to be designated by their own true name.

If economic freedom is not enough for all, we want for ourselves.

Freedom is not enough available for all and the challenge is to figure out how to distribute it. Arguing in favor

of freedom in the abstract is a waste of time because it's like to argue in favor of the tasty flavor of chicken meat, something that we all agree. As we disagree is to agree who will eat the chicken, or you ... or me ... or major foreign consortia or the Argentine people.


"When in 1809 on the occasion of the request presented by Dillon and Twaites British merchants to import goods, the Viceroy Cisneros looked up the opinion of the trustee and the attorney Yaniz Aguero ... and they said:" It would be rash to equate the American industry with the English. These bold engineers have brought us ponchos, which is the main branch of industry Cordoba and Santiago del Estero, wools and cottons well above our fleeces and paintings of Cochabamba can provide cheaper and therefore wholly ruining our factories and reduce poverty to an innumerable multitude of men and women who remain with their yarns and fabrics. It is a mistake to believe that the cheapness is beneficial to the country. It is not when it leads to the ruin of the industry and the reason is clear, because when it blooms, cease the works, and in the absence these wages are suspended and then, what will be advanced that no two which cost more formerly worth four, if not win more than one? arts, industries and agriculture itself still come here to the last degree of contempt and neglect. Many of our provinces will necessarily ruin resulting from this division and rivalry between them. "Viceroy Cisneros alarmed ... did not dare to implement an absolute free trade. The First Meeting under the influence of provincial representatives continued to maintain a manufacturing protectionism and financial support to avoid desmantelameinto inside and evasion of gold, and abundanete only through internal change by then. XIII Assembly only give a broad and theoretical equality and freedom, then as now, mean foreign hegemony, poverty, unemployment and ruin for us.


industral level of a country is the index measures the degree of its development, the height of its elevation in the zoological scale and extent of independence that has been achieved. All political independence is embedded in the rock of economic independence, independence is a fiction that there can be no such thing as freedom or on a personal level or on the bus, because the first and fundamental freedom of man is able to develop their industrious and creative capacity that distinguishes it from quadrumane primordialente only know how to use your fingers to grab the fruit with which it feeds. Care industry in the national equivalent to care for their freedom on the personal. Question

so intractable and dangerous. Because it is difficult to pinpoint the right amount of rights and obligations that govern relations between the rich and the proletariat, between those who provide the capital and those who contribute their labor. And dangerous this conflict, because people frequently turbulent and malicious twist to pervert the trial of the truth and move the crowd to sedition.

In any case, we see clearly, and agree that all that need help, prompt and timely manner, the men from the lowest class, as most of them unworthy resolved in a miserable and calamitous situation . Well, in the last century destroyed the ancient trade guilds, without being replaced by nothing, and after deviating Nations and civil laws of the religion of our fathers, little by little has happened that the workers were found delivered, alone and helpless, to the inhumanity of their employers and the unbridled greed of competitors.

to increase the evil, greedy wine usury, which, more than once condemned by order of the Church, is provided in various forms, the same in being, exercised by men greedy and greedy. Along with this it works contracts and trade in all things are almost entirely in the hands of a few, in such a way that few men have opulent and delicious on the shoulders of the innumerable multitude of proletarians a yoke almost of slavery.

Property and

law is so clear the strength of these arguments, we do not understand how people have been able to contradict them, resurrecting old utopias, man certainly grant the land use and the fruits as diverse fields, but totally denied the exclusive domain of the soil where there is built, or of property that has grown. And do not realize that in this way defraud the things man learned to their work. For a field worked by the hand and the skill of a grower, and not the field before: the wild, it is fruitful, and barren, fertile. (...) As effects follow their cause and the result work in justice belongs to those who worked. No wonder, then, the whole human race, without taking care of a few opponents, attentive only to the law of nature, in this law is the foundation of the division of property and solemnly, by the practice of all time enshrined private property as well as to human nature and the quiet and peaceful social coexistence. "And the civil laws, when they are just, derive from the same natural law its own power and effectiveness, confirm this right and ensure the protection of public authority. "All this is sanctioned by divine law, which strictly prohibits even the mere desire for the alien: Do not covet your neighbor's wife, nor the house or the field, or maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything else any of all that you own.

natural law of man, as we saw, is the private ownership of property, it is not only permissible but absolutely necessary, especially in society, the exercise of that right. Is lawful, "says St. Thomas, and even necessary for human life that the man owns some property. But if you then ask for the use of such property, the Church does not hesitate to reply: As to why a man should not hold the property as his own, but as common, so that easily communicate with others when as may be required. And so the Apostle says: 'Command the rich of this world and communicate easily give it his own. " No, indeed, is obliged to assist others with what they needed or to himself for his own, though it be for the appropriate or proper decorum itself, because no one can stop living like its been appropriate, but, once satisfied the necessity and convenience, it is a duty to help the needy with the superfluous .(...) Here there are obligations of justice, but of Christian charity, whose compliance can not, indeed, require legally. But over the laws and judgments of men are the law and the trial of Christ, which in many ways urges practice to give generously, 'Whatever you did for one of these least of these my brethren, you did for me. "

National prosperity

Above all, governments are obliged to cooperate in general with the whole set of laws and political institutions, directing and administering the State so as to promote both private and public prosperity. This is in fact the duty of wise statesmanship, and this is the mission of the rulers of the people. Now, the prosperity of nations is derived especially morality, of right and orderly family formation, the guardian of religion and justice, equitable distribution of public charges, the progress of industry and trade, the flourishing of agriculture and many other things, the better they be promoted, more contribute to the happiness of the people. Now for all that the state can go in an extraordinary way to the welfare of the other classes, and also that of the proletariat, and therefore rightfully theirs and not be suspected of undue interference, because they provide the common good is trade and competition State. Therefore, the larger the sum of the gains achieved by this very general estimate, the lower the need for other procedures to go by welfare workers.

But it has to be considered further something that touches even deeper into this question: namely, that the State is a harmonious unity that embraces equally the lower and upper classes. The proletarians are citizens of the same natural right that rich people are citizens, members of the true and living, through family, comprises the State, and may even be said to be the greatest number. And if it would be absurd to provide a class of citizens at the expense of another, is rigorous duty of the State concerned, in due form, the welfare of workers: to do so is lack of justice which ordains that every one his own. As Aquinas wisely cautioned: "As part and whole are in a well as it is quite is also, somehow, of the part. Therefore, among the many and more serious duties of rulers who the public good, stands out first to provide equally to all groups of citizens, noting with inviolable fairness of distributive justice.

Although all citizens are obliged, without exception, to cooperate for the common welfare, which is then reflected the benefit of individuals, cooperation can not be at all or an equal or the same. Switch places, and changed again, forms of government, but there will always be that variety and class differences, without which there can be even conceived of human society. There will always be rulers legislators, judges, in short, men who govern the nation in peace and defend it in war, and clear is that, when they the proximate cause of the common good and effective, form the main part of the nation. The workers can not cooperate for the common welfare in the same manner and with the same offices, but truth is that they also concur, very effectively, with their services. And truth is that social welfare, as it should be in achieving a good to perfect citizens as men, must be placed primarily in virtue.

However, any well-constituted society must be able to ensure a sufficient supply of external goods and materials whose use necessary for the exercise of virtue. And it is clear that to achieve these assets is necessary and work very efficiently and activity of the proletariat, now engaged to work the fields, now they are trained in the workshops. Sum, we have said, and in such a way, it can be argued, indeed, that the work of the workers is the possibility to pick up the national wealth. Just is, therefore, that the government is interested in the workers, involve them somehow in the wealth they produce, have a house in which to dwell, dressed to be covered, so you can spend your life with less potential difficulties. Is clear, therefore, the obligation to protect as possible everything that can improve the condition of the workers, like Providence, far from harming anyone, draw well at all, because public interest is not to remain in misery those on whom so much advantage comes at the same state. Just pay



It is said that the wage has to be specified by the free consent of the parties, in such a way that the employer, after paying the wage agreed upon, and has done his duty, not obligated to come nothing more. Only when, or the employer does not pay full wages or the worker does not perform all the work set, is an injustice, and only in these cases and to protect these rights, but not for other reasons, it is lawful intervention.

this argument is no easy or fully accept who deem equitable, because it is not fair in its entirety, then you are missing a very important consideration.

The human activity work is ordered to supply the necessities of life and especially for self-preservation: the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread. And so the work is printed man by nature two characters: the personal self, because the working force is inherent in the person, who is completely typical of the exercise and the benefit of whom was given; course, necessary, because the fruit of labor profit a man to keep his life-support, which is inexcusable duty imposed by nature. Therefore, if one looks only at the aspect of personality, it is true that the worker can agree on a salary that is less than fair, because, he voluntarily offer their work by its own will can also do with a modest salary and to fully renounce him. But quite otherwise been thinking when, in addition to personality, considering the need, both logically distinct, but inseparable in reality. The truth is that life is stored in a duty, which nobody can fail without fault. Follows as a necessary consequence the right to procure the means for sustain, that in fact, poor people are reduced to wage their own work.

And so, recognizing that employers and workers formed by mutual consent a deal, and specifically indicate the amount of wages, it is true that there comes always an element of natural justice, prior and superior to the free will of the parties, this is that the amount of wages should not be less than the maintenance of the worker, provided it is frugal and good manners. If he, through necessity, or fear the worst, accept tougher covenants, which are to be accepted, like it or not want, as imposed by the owner or operator, this is as much subject to violence against that justice is stirred.

Savings -
property
If the worker receives a wage sufficient to support himself, his wife and their children will be easy, for it is unwise to think in a reasonable savings and, seconding the momentum of the same nature, try to use what remains over after the necessary expenses, to form little by little a small capital. We have shown how there is no practical and effective solution to the labor question, if not previously set before an indisputable principle of respecting the right of private property. Law, which law should encourage, and even do everything possible so that between classes of people, has the largest number of owners.

It would be two notable profits, and, firstly, a division of the property is certainly more in equity.

Because violence of revolutions has produced the division of society into two classes of citizens, each separated by a vast distance. On the one hand, an extra-strength class, precisely because of its extraordinary wealth, which, being the only one in his hand all the means of production and trade, enjoyed for its own use and enjoyment of all sources of wealth, and has no little power even in the same government of the State; and in front of a crowd poor and weak, wounded spirits and soon totally always stirred. Now, if this crowd does excite its activity in the hope of being able to purchase stable properties gradually will approach one class to another, disappearing the vast distance between the super-rich and too poor. Moreover, the earth will produce more wealth. When men know that work in its own grounds, make a greater effort and dedication, and until they learn to great affection for the country worked with their own hands, and which expects to himself and his family not only food but up some slack abundant. Enthusiasm for the work, which will greatly assist in increasing the production of land and wealth of the nation. And even should be added a third benefit: attachment-by all-to his native land, with the desire to remain where they were born, not wanting to change the country when their alternates in his ways to spend your life in a tolerable . These advantages, which can not be achieved but only on condition that private property is not burdened by excessive taxes and taxation. Then if the right of private property is due to the nature and effect of law is not human, the state can not abolish it, but only moderate use and to harmonize with the common good: the state would work as unjust and cruel, whether by way of tribute demanded of individuals much more of what may be due in justice.